Knowledgeable Dynamic-Process Modeling and Execution
(March 2009–March 2010)
Infosys Technologies/Boeing
Daniel Corkill
We are developing a dynamic-process management framework that extends our
previous research on ProME and KPM. Managing and participating in complex,
dynamic processes is difficult due to their inherent uncertainty, which
undermines the predictability necessary for efficient planning and
execution. Effective management of these processes hinges on the ability of
the manager to recognize unanticipated difficulties in the process execution,
determine the causes of the anomalies, and implement remedies. Current
process-management approaches respond reactively to process dynamics, if they
deal with them at all.
We are focusing on how human process managers and participants interact with a
dynamic, on-line representation of executing dynamic processes to proactively
manage and operate in dynamic business processes. We show how having the best
information available about a process and its expected future can provide
managers with the time needed to detect and understand impending process
anomalies and to develop and implement effective interventions.
Susan Lander, Daniel Corkill, and Zachary Rubinstein. KPM: A tool for
intelligent project management and execution. In Proceedings of the
Workshop on Intelligent Workflow and Process Management: The New Frontier for
AI in Business, Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial
Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden, August 1999.
Daniel D. Corkill. When workflow doesn't work: Issues in managing dynamic
processes. In Proceedings of the Design Project Support using Process
Models Workshop, Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence
in Design, pages 1–13, Worcester, Massachusetts, June 2000.
article
Daniel D. Corkill, Zachary B. Rubinstein, Susan E. Lander, and Victor
R. Lesser. Live-representation process management. In Proceedings of the
Fifth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, volume
8, pages 202–208, Angers, France, April 2003.
article
Zachary B. Rubinstein and Daniel D. Corkill. Mixed-initiative management of
dynamic business processes. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International
Workshop on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, pages 39–44,
Binghamton, New York, June 2003.
article
Daniel D. Corkill, Zachary B. Rubinstein, and Susan E. Lander. Coordination
of human and software agents in time and resource-constrained dynamic
processes. In Proceedings of the AAMAS 2003 Workshop on Humans and
Multi-Agent Systems, Melbourne, Australia, July 2003.
Bootstrapped Learning
(April 2007–November 2009)
SRI International/DARPA
Daniel Corkill, Huzaifa Zafar
The Bootstrapped Learning program seeks to make instructable computing a
reality. An “electronic student” is being developed that will
learn from a human teacher who uses spoken language, gestures, demonstration,
and many other methods that one would find in a human mentored relationship.
We are contributing to the design and implementation of the knowledge
repository, control module, and self-diagnosis component of the MABEL
electronic student.
Past Projects
A Cognitive Framework for Resource-Aware Sensor Net Organizations
(January 2005–December 2007)
Air Force Research Laboratory
Daniel Corkill, Victor Lesser, Steven Hoffman, Michael
O'Neill, Huzaifa Zafar
CNAS (Collaborative Network for Atmospheric Sensing) is a rapidly deployable,
agent-based, power-aware microsensor network for ground-level atmospheric
monitoring. To conserve battery power, and hence extend the useful lifetime
of the network, CNAS sensor agents must have their Wi-Fi communication
adapters turned off much of the time. This complicates agent interaction and
network responsiveness since an agent cannot simply turn on its Wi-Fi radio
when it needs to send a message; it has to ensure that other agents also have
their radios turned on in order to receive or relay the message. Such power
constraints required CNAS agents to collaborate effectively at an
architectural level as well as on atmospheric monitoring tasks.
CNAS research activities were performed in five main areas: 1) implementation
of a blackboard-based, individual agent architecture that could be effective
given the limited computing facilities at each sensor agent; 2) development of
the CNAS agent and network software architecture and atmospheric sensing
knowledge sources; 3) improving CNAS performance and responsiveness with
limited radio availability; 4) power-aware reasoning associated with solar
harvesting performed by each sensor agent; and 5) exploration of potential
next-generation CNAS hardware.
Field deployments of CNAS included the 2006 PATRIOT Exercise held at Fort
McCoy, Wisconsin and two deployments (drop-zone and urban) at the 2007
Talisman Saber Combined Exercise conducted in Queensland, Australia.
Daniel D. Corkill. Deploying power-aware, wireless sensor
agents. The Computer Journal, special issue on Agent
Technologies for Sensor Networks, 2010, to appear.
Huzaifa Zafar and Daniel D. Corkill. Reducing online model
development time by agents using constraints between shared
observations. The Computer Journal, special issue on Agent
Technologies for Sensor Networks, 2010, to appear.
Alex Rogers, Daniel D. Corkill, and Nicholas R. Jennings. Agent
Technologies for Sensor Networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems,
24(2):13–17, March/April 2009.
Daniel D. Corkill, Douglas Holzhauer, and Walter Koziarz. Turn off your
radios! Environmental monitoring using power-constrained sensor agents. In
Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Agent Technology for
Sensor Networks (ATSN-07), pages 31–38, Honolulu, Hawaii, May
2007.
article
Daniel D. Corkill. Reporting down under: A CNAS (Collaborative Network for
Atmospheric Sensing) update. In Proceedings of the Second International
Workshop on Agent Technology for Sensor Networks (ATSN-08), pages
25–32, Estoril, Portugal, May 2008.
article
Huzaifa Zafar and Daniel Corkill. Simplifying solar-harvesting model
development in situated agents using pre-deployment learning and information
sharing. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Agent
Technology for Sensor Networks (ATSN-08), pages 41–48, Estoril,
Portugal, May 2008.
Huzaifa Zafar, Victor Lesser, Daniel Corkill, and Deepak Ganesan. Using
organization knowledge to improve routing performance in wireless multi-agent
networks. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2008), pages
821–828, Estoril, Portugal, May 2008.
Daniel D. Corkill. A cognitive framework for resource-aware sensor net
organizations. Final report, AFRL Advanced Computing Architecture Program,
Rome, New York, March 2008.
An Enhanced Collaborative-Software Environment for Information Fusion
(September 2004–January 2007)
U.S. Army RDECOM CERDEC ARES-FIST program
Daniel Corkill, Raphen Becker, Paul Kohler, Kenneth Watts,
Huzaifa Zafar
We developed a highly responsive, blackboard-system based, decision-support
technology for improving the effectiveness of analysts and decision makers
within the Army's Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs). The CIFA (Collaborative
Information-Fusion Assistant) reasoner (CIFAR) augments and supports Army
personnel in answering Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs) associated
with monitoring, assessing, and responding to enemy courses of action and
other battlespace-environment characteristics. A major challenge in CIFA is
managing the combinatorial explosion of sensing and processing activities
without sacrificing accurate inference. The large volumes of data,
possibilities, and outcomes exceed human perceptual and cognitive abilities
and require an effective human/computer partnership to make the best use of
sensing, computation, and communication resources in highly dynamic and
uncertain battlefield environments. Before CIFAR, time constraints and
information overload resulted in hasty, partial analysis of the information
available to intelligence personnel. CIFAR was designed to help Army analysts
and decision makers focus their attention on appropriate data by providing
spatially and temporally aggregated views of the environment and by ensuring
that important information has not been overlooked.
Our research focused on representation strategies for effective reasoning,
temporal and spatial aggregation techniques, and control of reasoning
processes. Significant collective information is present in the stream of
individual human-generated and automated-sensor intelligence, surveillance,
and reconnaissance (ISR) reports that are available to analysts and decision
makers. Harvesting this rich collective information required semantically
aggregating individual reports in both space and time. Rather than discarding
detailed spatial and temporal information in order to simplify automated
reasoning, we investigated how to make use of all the information that can be
obtained from ISR and other sources.
Daniel D. Corkill. Representation and contribution-integration challenges
in collaborative situation assessment. In Proceedings of the Eighth
International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion 2005), pages
xxix–xxxi, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July 2005. (Invited
panelist.)
article
Erik Blasch, Ivan Kadar, John Salerno, Mieczyslaw M. Kokar, Subrata Das,
Gerald M. Powell, Daniel D. Corkill, and Enrique H. Ruspini. Issues and
challenges in situation assessment (Level 2 fusion). Journal of Advances in
Information Fusion, 1(2):122–139, December 2006.
Raphen Becker and Daniel Corkill. Determining confidence when integrating
contributions from multiple agents. In Proceedings of the Sixth
International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent
Systems (AAMAS 2007), pages 449–456, Honolulu, Hawaii, May 2007.
article
Daniel D. Corkill. An enhanced collaborative-software environment for
information fusion at the unit of action. Final report, U.S. Army RDECOM
CERDEC IIWD, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, June 2007.
Architectural Analysis and Investigation of Command & Control, and Data
Fusion Systems
(September 2004–March 2008)
DND Canada TDP
Daniel Corkill
We provided AI software-architecture design recommendations and reviews to
DRDC Valcartier and contractors developing above-water anti-missile threat
assessment and weapon assignment systems for next generation Halifax class
Canadian Navy frigates.
Daniel D. Corkill. Software architecture choices for naval command &
control and decision-support systems. Report to DND Canada, September
2005.